[SPARK-53819][3.5] Upgrade commons-lang3 to 3.19.0 #52535
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Commons-lang3 3.12.0 contains CVE-2025-48924
dongjoon-hyun
requested changes
Oct 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To @eschcam , when it comes to backport, you need to verify that CVE is really meaningful for the users.
I don't think the Apache Spark is affected because we don't use org.apache.commons.lang3.ClassUtils.getClass method's CVE bug.
Commons-lang3 3.12.0 contains GHSA-j288-q9x7-2f5v
Please provide more reasons for justification.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade commons-lang3 to 3.19.0
Why are the changes needed?
Commons-lang3 3.12.0 contains CVE-2025-48924
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Passed CI tests
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No